There are three things I covered in my exploratory paper. First, I discussed a little about what exactly abortion is and why it is so controversial, like the definitions and the methods used. Second, I showed the pro-life side of people who believe it is wrong to have an abortion. I gave examples and reasons to support this side and show their points, like the Bible and ethical controversies this creates. Third, I showed the pro-choice side of people who believe that a woman has every right to have an abortion and it is not wrong to do so. I also gave examples and reasons to support this side and show their beliefs, like the Bible being misinterpreted and how the definitions vary to say it is not "murder".
I think the side most dominant is the fact that it is ok to have an abortion and people do not see anything wrong with this. I think this because when people hear of abortion the word is sugar coated so much that people do not really understand what this intells. People do not see what the doctors really do or the effects it has on people afterwards. They just know it as a way out of a sticky situation. No responsibility for something they do not want. People are not educated enough on the issue.
I think the side that should be dominant is the fact that it is not ok to have an abortion. I think people need to understand what they get into if they go through with this act. An abortion generally happens when a woman gets pregnant and does not want the child. Why should we give yet another way out for people to not take responsibility for their actions by getting rid of an innocent victim.
This can be enforced as a policy to make people understand what they do before we allow them to make such an action and only allow this under strict circumstances. Show the women other options if they do not want the child, ex. giving it up for adoption.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment